🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."